I don't get all the hate heaped on
Superman Returns. Granted, I don't think I've seen it since it was in theaters, but it's not a bad movie. If you want a bad movie based on a DC comic character, there are plenty to choose from --- ignoring the low-hanging fruit of
Superman IV and
Green Lantern, do you remember
Steel?
Superman Returns' only real crime was being a movie that didn't act as a proper tentpole for a franchise. It was designed to look and feel like a Richard Donner Super-film, and it succeeded in that regard. That doesn't make it very exciting to watch, maybe, but it wasn't
bad. DC and the movie producers were not shy about their intentions for
Man of Steel; if this movie was successful, it would be the first in a string of DC superhero movies, culminating in a Justice League film. Basically, they saw what Marvel did with
The Avengers and thought, "We should probably do that, too."
Aside from Superman being a hitchhiking hobo and direction from
Sucker Punch creator Zack Snyder, the trailer looks pretty good. I was curious as to whether or not they would explain what Superman uses to shave, since even flames don't affect his body hair, but that is a fairly minor point.
 |
| SPOILER ALERT: they don't |
Man of Steel begins on the planet of Krypton. Actually, we spend a surprising amount of time on this world, following Jor-El (
Russell Crowe),
the preeminent bodybuilding scientist on the planet, as he tries to
convince the ruling class that their world is going to end. They don't
believe him, which turns out to mean absolutely nothing because they are
promptly murdered by Krypton's preeminent shouting soldier, Zod (
Michael Shannon).
 |
| "Kee-rist, Zod! Inside voices, please!" |
So what's the point of these scenes? Well, Jor-El takes some desperate
chances while Zod's forces battled the government; he grabs something
of great importance to Krypton's people (a skull) and does something
questionable with it (dissolves it over his infant son), because science. Sure of his
apocalyptic conclusions, Jor violates almost every FAA rule and sends
his baby boy to Earth, via rocket, all by his lonesome. And then Zod
kills Jor and Krypton explodes. Not before Zod and his forces are
overcome and punished by being trapped in another dimension, though.
 |
| Zod looks like the sort of guy who types with the caps lock key on |
On Earth, that infant grows up to be Clark Kent (
Henry Cavill),
and his alien physiology makes him different from normal folks in a
variety of ways: super-strength, heat vision, super-speed, etc. You
know the super-drill.
 |
| Or maybe this super-drill is a little more angry than what you're used to |
Clark was taught by his adoptive father (
Kevin Costner) to keep his head low and hide his extraordinary abilities. The logic to this
being that people fear what they do not understand and...um...a super
being might get his feelings hurt? Whatever the reason, Clark
grows up to be a do-gooding drifter, helping random people out whenever
he can and then slinking off into the shadows before they can ask him
any questions. Eventually, Zod and his minions come to Earth, looking
for the son of Jor-El. Their entrance is dramatic, and they essentially
offer to spare the Earth if their fellow Kryptonian turns himself over
to Zod. But what does Zod really have in mind for the people of
Earth? And what does this mean for Clark? Where does Clark fit in, as
the child of two worlds? What kind of "man" is he? (The answer is
"super.")
The acting in
Man of Steel is all pretty much above-board.
Henry Cavill
carried the angst of his character very well; this is easily the best acting I've seen from him.
Cavill also looks fairly tough, so the concept of him being able to
punch through your face seems a little less far-fetched than some other
actors who have played the part. While Cavill's Superman was certainly
sympathetic --- I would argue he gave the most vulnerable Superman
performance on film to date --- he doesn't show much personality beyond
the angst; but that is more of a script issue than a fault in Cavill's
portrayal.
 |
| "Alright Henry, for this scene, imagine that your iPod has nothing but Morrissey on it" |
Superman's love interest, Lois Lane, is played by
Amy Adams,
and this is the best Lane we've seen on the big screen. She actually
seems strong and intelligent, like an award-winning reporter should.
Almost as important, her "plucky reporter" bit wasn't obnoxious. I
thought
Kevin Costner
did a pretty good job as an overprotective parent; Costner can be a
little one-dimensional in this role, but it was refreshing to see anyone
in this movie look genuinely concerned over Superman's well-being.
 |
| "Son, just calm down...and please don't murder me and your mother" |
I have some serious issues with the writing of his character, but Costner did a fine job acting.
Diane Lane
was also okay as Clark's mother, although her part is pretty
conventional. I will say that it felt odd seeing her play a part that
was a touch too old for her.
Russell Crowe
was good as Jor-El; he was suitably stoic when he played a hologram,
but his action hero turn on Krypton seemed a little un-scientist-like.
Still, he was in a lot more of the movie than I expected and wasn't bad
by any means.
Ayelet Zurer had a small part as Superman's Kryptonian mom, but it didn't really amount to much.
Michael Shannon's
work as Zod was tough for me to rate.
 |
| And, at times, identify |
Yes, he was suitably
intimidating. Yes, he provided a physical threat to Superman, something
that most Superman villains do not do. I think my issue has less to do
with Shannon's performance than with how the character was written;
when given the opportunity, Shannon made this awful monster sympathetic
--- but we have to wait almost the entire movie to get to that point. Until that moment of insight, he comes across as a gigantic asshole. Nothing more, nothing less.
Antje Traue was Shannon's right-hand-woman, and she was decent; I liked what I saw, but she didn't really do much more than glare.
Christopher Meloni had a fairly substantial part and he played an aggressive authority figure.
Go figure. I like Meloni, but his movie roles have been pretty bland lately.
Richard Schiff and Laurence Fishburne did very little aside from lending their familiar faces to bit parts.
I have to admit that
Zack Snyder didn't do a terrible job directing
Man of Steel. Snyder curbed his tendency to throw needless slow-motion in every scene and instead played to his strength: visuals. This is a fantastic-looking film. The set and costume designs were good, the cinematography felt epic, and the super-battles were suitably huge.
 |
| Above: epic super-fart |
Snyder still can't direct his actors to do much more than shout, but that's less noticeable in a superhero movie. I did start to get bored during the action sequences, though. Superman and Zod knocked created a lot of collateral damage, but a lot of it looked awfully similar. The important thing is this: Snyder is a director with visual flair, and he made a gorgeous Superman movie. He didn't write the movie, though.
That was the work of
David S. Goyer and, to a lesser extent,
Christopher Nolan. This screenplay certainly achieved one of its goals; I can definitely see this film spawning sequels and tie-ins, just as
Iron Man set the stage for the films leading to
The Avengers. It also told a solid origin story and left some plot threads dangling that will doubtlessly be used in the inevitable sequel. From a branding perspective, I suppose this script also sets the DC movie universe apart from that of the Marvel universe; there is a distinct science fiction vibe to this superhero movie, and that could open a promising door to some of DC's other characters. Having said all that, I must admit that I didn't actually
like the writing in
Man of Steel. For every character that was done well (Lois Lane, Jor-El), there were three or four that took everything with straight-faced indifference. I don't blame the actors or the director for that. The script leaves very little for them to do, aside from pose and look upset. The worst case of this was Zod, who was a raving lunatic for 90% of the movie and then, finally, had a humanizing moment, although it came an hour too late to make up for his behavior in the rest of the film. But that's not the biggest problem with
Man of Steel.
My biggest problem with
Man of Steel is with the tone. To say that it is "dark" doesn't do it justice.
***SPOILER ALERT***
Superman's Earth-Dad straight up tells his son to not save people. Hell, his character basically commits tornado-assisted suicide just to teach his son a lesson. What's worse is the fact that our Superman-to-be lets it happen. He could have easily saved the life of his adoptive father, but he opts not to. That is not exactly the sort of thing you typically see in a movie with a hero in it, super or otherwise. Of course, the back story is also pretty bleak. The Kryptonians had colonies spread across the galaxy, equipped with terraformers to make hostile environments suitable for their settlers. When Krypton decided that they did not want to expand their empire, they sent out a bus to pick everyone up and bring them home cut off provisions to those colonies, and everybody died. Later, when Zod is preparing to end the human race by terraforming the planet, he ignores the fact that Kryptonians can, over time, get used to Earth without killing every living creature on the planet. Why? Because he would rather eliminate an entire species than be patient. Of course, he also could have used the terraformers on any of the other dozen former colonies that he visited, but that would have robbed him of the chance to destroy all human life. That's pretty bleak stuff. And then there are the approximately three million civilian casualties from the Superman/Zod battle. The city of Metropolis is ruined. Completely. Most of those collapsed buildings had to have people inside them, and that ignores all the people running for their lives as their world fell on top of them.
 |
| Yeah, hold on to your coat. That will help you. |
Similarly, Smallville will take a decade to recover from Zod's visit. The nameless Asian city off the coast of where the terraformer was probably took a lot of damage in the form of tidal waves, too. Some people have issues with Superman killing Zod, but it makes sense in the context of this movie. Zod was going to kill those stupid people in the railway station, and Superman did all that he could to stop it, because those random people were more important than the several hundred he punched Zod through during their battle. Actually, I was a little surprised at Zod's execution, but there weren't many options, and that thematically confirmed Superman as a citizen of Earth. Still, the presumed off-camera body count in
Man of Steel is mind-boggling. And that sort of destruction could work in another movie. But in a Superman movie...? I'm not so sure. Hell, I'm not sure that more than
one of those depressing-ass factoids makes sense in a Superman movie, much less all of them. There is usually a sense of hope and optimism accompanying this character that can sometimes come across as corny Americana.
Not this time.
Man of Steel feels like someone saw what a gritty tone did for the Batman franchise and decided "If they like gritty Batman, they'll
love gritty Superman!" And I suppose they gave the people what they wanted, if the box office numbers are to be believed.
As a standalone film,
Man of Steel is decent. It was a relief that this movie didn't completely suck, and I hope to see more DC movies in the future, thanks to the success of this film. Amy Adams and Henry Cavill are a solid core for this franchise and I wouldn't even mind Zack Snyder returning for another movie. I honestly believe that they're going in the wrong direction with this, though. Sequels have to up the ante, and the angst, death and destruction in this movie are already turned up to eleven.
Man of Steel was well-executed and impressive, but the questionable thematic choices kept me from truly enjoying it.
